Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrea Glorioso <andrea.glorioso@...>
Cc: <consortium@...>
Date: Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 2:57 am

>

> But don't come back later

What are you talking about? I contacted Daniel immidiatelly after i
found out about this. Pretty much everything was private at that time.
That's a huge difference. And there's still no neutral place which would
serve for advocacy related discussions.

> And don't whine if I

You don't have to. Luckily i can *now* read it here:
http://lists.agnula.org/pipermail/consortium/2004-January/thread.html

> > Was a consortium really launched to *create*?

Discussing? I haven't seen any discussions.

>

?

>

*None* of them. There's only one relationship between the authors of a
project and the project itself. Copyright.

>

So what if a company(member) that has no direct involvement in a project
abuses that project(member)? How is your consortium going to protect the
project?

>

Electing Fred as a member of that organization since he's a natural
person, he's active in a project.

> > Unfortunately this isn't happening. It puts a consortium of

> I honestly can't see how the companies are put into the spotlight

"consortium of companies and libre software projects"
That's
1. companies
2. libre software projects.

>

?

I did underestimate the fact that somebody else might get the domain for
different purposes.

I *don't* underestimate the importance of LAD.

>

Not unless the domain acts as home for LAD, LAU and LAA at first place.
I'm even willing to buy that domain for the purpose of providing it for
the three mailinglists.

We need *basic* services first, if we want to promote linux audio.
That's providing news, and documentation, tutorials for both developers
and users.

Establishing a serious organization governed by law(ownership,
contracts, tax exemptions, grants, etc) and providing services is the
last step.

Marek

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Marek Peteraj, (Fri Jan 23, 11:09 pm)
[Consortium] stream relay network..., Joern Nettingsmeier, (Fri Apr 8, 2:17 am)
Re: [Consortium] Linux trademark, Daniel James, (Wed Jun 29, 7:07 pm)
[Consortium] Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation..., Eric Dantan Rzewnicki, (Tue Mar 28, 9:49 pm)
[Consortium] Linuxaudio.org minor server update, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Fri Aug 11, 9:04 pm)
[Consortium] new releases, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Dec 19, 1:21 pm)
Re: [Consortium] new musical keyboard, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Thu Feb 26, 7:50 pm)
Re: [Consortium] First L2Ork track now available, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Dec 9, 3:47 am)
Re: [Consortium] OpenUp your Concept, Robin Gareus, (Fri Apr 23, 8:42 pm)
Re: [Consortium] lao subdomains, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Apr 26, 9:18 pm)
Re: [Consortium] OpenUp your Concept, Daniel James, (Sat Apr 24, 3:40 pm)
Re: [Consortium] csound debian packages on the way, Ken Restivo, (Wed Apr 9, 6:40 pm)
[Consortium] Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation..., Eric Dantan Rzewnicki, (Wed Mar 29, 2:00 pm)
Re: [Consortium] stream relay network..., Daniel James, (Mon Apr 18, 4:38 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Andrea Glorioso, (Fri Jan 23, 11:39 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Joern Nettingsmeier, (Sat Jan 24, 5:32 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Andrea Glorioso, (Sat Jan 24, 5:48 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Steve Harris, (Sat Jan 24, 10:29 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Andrea Glorioso, (Mon Jan 26, 4:15 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Marek Peteraj, (Sat Jan 24, 2:57 am)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Andrea Glorioso, (Sat Jan 24, 4:56 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Marek Peteraj, (Sat Jan 24, 5:19 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Andrea Glorioso, (Sat Jan 24, 5:37 pm)
Re: [Consortium] linuxaudio.org, Marek Peteraj, (Sat Jan 24, 6:28 pm)