Re: [Consortium] Wider scope for linuxaudio.org: home audio

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <consortium@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 - 2:50 pm

Daniel James wrote:

> Do you think there are any specific projects that should be members of

Home audio is not included in this phrase of the "About"-text: "emphasis on
professional tools for the music, recording and broadcast industries." My
suggestion is to explicitely add "home audio" to this list. As far as I see it
one of the main issues in digital home audio is to promote the use and
development of open standards which are useable for Linux- and Open Source-based
home audio systems. A standard is not really open if you have to pay thousands
of Dollars to be able to read and use it or if a company can
"embrace-and-extend" it to monopolise it's position.

I think that quite a few of the companies which could be interested can be found
on these two lists:

Members of the UPnP Forum
http://upnp.org/membership/members.asp

Members of the "Digital Living Network Alliance"
http://www.dlna.org/about/roster

The list of UPnP Forum members is especially broad because there are no
membership fees (membership in the DLNA costs a lot).

Companies like AMD, BridgeCo or Transmeta could be asked. Also quite a few
consumer electronics-companies (such as Phillips or Samsung) for obvious reasons
are not happy with the current dominance of Microsoft in home audio and video.
That is why they created their own organisation:

Universal Home API
http://www.uhapi.org/home

Those companies are not on any of these lists:

Slim Devices
(not using Linux in their current devices but has grown an Open Source community
around their SlimServer software - which is implemented in Perl. They might be
interested in closer connections to the Linux Audio community)
http://slimdevices.com

Sonos
(using Linux in their devices)
http://www.sonos.com

PONTIS digital entertainment
(using Linux in their MediaServer MS300)
http://pontis.de/site_e/home_e.htm

Cheers,
Andreas

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] Re: LinuxAudio.org and Salem Radio Labs, Daniel James, (Fri Jan 23, 6:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Wider scope for linuxaudio.org: home audio, Andreas Kuckartz, (Tue Jan 11, 2:50 pm)
[Consortium] Linux trademark, Daniel James, (Wed Jun 29, 4:33 pm)
[Consortium] Macbook Pro + JACKD = incredible latency, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon Aug 7, 8:39 am)
[Consortium] Weaver Birds - 8 years of dyne.org, jaromil, (Fri Aug 8, 10:08 am)
[Consortium] LAC2009 update, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 24, 12:14 am)
[Consortium] First L2Ork track now available, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Dec 9, 3:07 am)
[Consortium] lao subdomains, Robin Gareus, (Thu Apr 26, 3:47 pm)
Re: [Consortium] lao subdomains, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Apr 27, 12:19 am)
Re: [Consortium] lao subdomains, Robin Gareus, (Fri Apr 27, 2:50 pm)
Re: [Consortium] lao subdomains, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Apr 26, 8:47 pm)
[Consortium] LAO stats -- was Re: lao subdomains, Robin Gareus, (Fri Apr 27, 2:31 pm)
Re: [Consortium] olpc linux-powered Csound makes the news, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon Apr 7, 7:15 pm)
[Consortium] Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation..., Eric Dantan Rzewnicki, (Tue Mar 28, 9:52 pm)
[Consortium] RE: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation..., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Tue Mar 28, 11:31 pm)
[Consortium] Status update - Boost Hardware Ltd, DJCJ..., Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Oct 10, 3:51 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Linux trademark, jaromil, (Wed Jun 29, 8:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Linux trademark, Daniel James, (Thu Jun 30, 4:30 pm)
[Consortium] Re: LinuxAudio.org and Salem Radio Labs, Fred Gleason, (Fri Jan 23, 7:57 pm)
[Consortium] Re: LinuxAudio.org and Salem Radio Labs, Daniel James, (Fri Jan 23, 10:34 pm)