linuxaudio.org

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:

quoted text
> >From the first half of the article one could think that a misunderstanding took

> place. The author uses the term "free software updates", but he obviously was

> not referring to updates of "free software" but to free "software updates".

>

> But then he writes this: "In fact, there are still those totally illogical

> people who think that all software should be free, no matter how much effort has

> been put into creating it - but that's an argument for another day! I'm sure

> those people wouldn't want to leave their front doors open with a 'Help Yourself

> To All My Stuff' sign outside, yet that seems to be exactly what they expect

> from software companies."

Thats true, its the classic Free v's $0 confusion.
- Steve