Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Davis <paul@...>
To: Jeff McClintock <jef@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Subject: Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 2:04 am

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jeff McClintock  wrote:


Jeff - I'd respectfully disagree with you here. It is true that the

MIDI specification offers no guidance on what a synthesis engine

should do when it receives two note on's with the same note number and

no intervening note off. But this is why so many real world

MIDI-driven synth engines offer various choices about how to handle

the situation, because people realized early on that it wasn't that

difficult to make it happen, and that a useful way of handling it

would be better than pretending it wasn't possible.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Jeff McClintock, (Wed Apr 14, 1:13 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 2:04 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Jens M Andreasen, (Wed Apr 14, 10:22 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Apr 14, 12:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, James Morris, (Wed Apr 14, 11:19 pm)