Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>, Jeff McClintock <jef@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 12:39 pm

Jens M Andreasen wrote:

Full ACK. There are some drum sample players that have problems when the
duration between note on and note off is to short and there ... there
are several reasons when not sending a note off might be nice, similar,
for some equipment it is nice if running status could be disabled, some
old sequencers can do this etc. pp. ... somebody wrote that one note off
would finish all note ons of the same number, this must not be true all
the time. Especially old MIDI equipment can behave very unusual. Anyway,
I'm using MIDI since it was on the market and even if there might be
some advantages when not sending a note off, there will be on
disadvantage, the most negative thing I know about MIDI, the "hanging
note". Or is it "frozen note" on English? The note that never will end
;). In case of doubt for MIDI we shouldn't think about advantages for
computer equipment, but how it would be for a natural instrument. I
guess on that list we found out, that every natural instrument will turn
a note off before the same note could be played again.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Jeff McClintock, (Wed Apr 14, 1:13 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 14, 2:04 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Jens M Andreasen, (Wed Apr 14, 10:22 am)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Apr 14, 12:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] successive note on midi events, James Morris, (Wed Apr 14, 11:19 pm)