linuxaudio.org

On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 20:07 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote:

quoted text
> Thanks everyone for all the help on my architecture questions. It

> seems like a lot of the best practise functionality has

> tools/components for it already in Jack. I *was* planning on using

> rtaudio in order to be cross platform, but if it's a lot easier to get

> things done in Jack, i could live with being limited to linux and OS

> X.

>

Jack MIDI should (at least in theory) be portable to any platform where

Jack runs.

quoted text
>

> Just wondered if I could poll opinions, for a real time step sequencer

> meant to do super tight timing and by syncable with other apps, is

> Jack going to be a lot easier to work with? Should I just lay into the

> jack tutorials?

Definitely yes.  Dramatically easier, and (AFAIK) the *only* API that

will give you jitter-free sample accurate MIDI between applications.
-dr
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev