linuxaudio.org

On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 19:40 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:

quoted text
> On 03/11/2011 07:22 PM, David Robillard wrote:

> > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:08 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:

>

> >> I will try and submit a patch to remove glib. It'll take some time because I

> >> have dozens of other things to do, but I will work on this. I had a quick look

> >> at sord, it seems it only needs glib's sequence and hash table. Is this correct,

> >> or will you need some more utilities?

> >

> > Overall I need sequence, hash table (or hash table like thing, I'll

> > probably use a radix tree), and module loading (currently still POSIX in

> > SLV2).

>

> From the docs I see that using GModule only adds Windows support

Well, yeah. "Portable" usually means "have to deal with *%&$# windows",

otherwise straight POSIX would be fine :)
> , unless you

quoted text
> also care about HP-UX. So, a small abstraction layer around dlopen() and

> LoadLibrary() should suffice, no?

Yep
> > No rush, I may make the relevant lib myself soon if you don't beat me to

quoted text
> > it, I just don't want to hold up the next release for it.

>

> No rush here as well. I can work on a patch, but on the other side I don't want

> to interfere if you're in the middle of your work.

I am deliberately trying to avoid doing that bit of work, because I'll

get lost off in la-la computer science land making data structures and

benchmarking them and stuff, and not making the LAD related releases I

really need to be making.
... I do enjoy that la-la land though. Soon enough. :)
-dr
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev