linuxaudio.org

On 07/13/2011 11:09 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> in fact, testing is not the best approach for verifying lock-free data

quoted text
> structures: an implementation may work for years, if a certain condition is

> never triggered. the only reasonable way to ensure the correctness is a formal

> proof. unfortunately, most publications assume a sequencially consistent memory

> model and sometimes even avoid dealing with the ABA problem.

To me, testing on real devices is needed, it's a pragmatic approach. But I agree

it doesn't solve the entire problem.
That said, what about simulation? One could for example implement a minimal

emulator for the abstract CPU and memory model described in

linux/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt, and test lock-free algorithms on this.
I personally think that's a good approach, in the spirit of unit testing. I'm

not talking about creating a full-fleged CPU emulator, just a minimal one, with

a simple custom language suitable for writing test suites.
Not only ringbuffers could be tested this way, but also other algorithms. But

all in all, it could be quite a lot of work I think. Maybe that would be a good

thesis subject ;)
--

  Olivier

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev