Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012 - 10:15 pm

I like the idea of an overall version number, so, LV2 V2.1 is released
which contains foo v0.7, ba v1.1, thing v0.4.

Over time foo is updated to v0.8, LV2 V2.2 gets released.

Any client/host using LV2 can then claim a version compatibility, ie
V2.1, but not V2.2.

Seems the most understandable approach to me, in my layman's terms.

Cheers

Chris

On 22/03/12 21:56, David Robillard wrote:

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 3:48 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Thu Mar 22, 6:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Paul Davis, (Thu Mar 22, 6:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Thu Mar 22, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 11:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Fri Mar 23, 7:09 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Mar 22, 10:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 11:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Brendan Jones, (Thu Mar 22, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Chris Goddard, (Thu Mar 22, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Tue Mar 27, 2:13 am)