> I do agree that he wants the system/app to just play --- he
Hmmm. Of course, choice is great. If JACK would be the base
audio layer in all distributions, noone will prevent you to
disable it and to use OSS/ALSA with esound or arts or
whatsoever. What's the problem?
But I guess I'm right - unfortunately. Do users want to have a
choice? Why did they all use Outlook? There always have been
alternatives; how many did use them? My opinion: Give the
user a well configured system with the best technology you
can find, and keep the system the way that the user can
change it. That's why we're are on Linux, aren't we?
> >If we'd be able to offer a perfect solution, it'll be used
Yes, that's true. That's why I wrote that we'd need some
promotion and marketing. Of course it is also possible to
take an existing company or organisation as a horse we can
sit on.
> There are plenty of smart people here -- and I'm sure they
Maybe, maybe not. Our forces are limited, and most people here
that can do something and are willing to do so are already
involved in at least 1 project.
I wonder if JACK could do the job, how many adjustments and
additions it would need and of course: who could do it. I
really do not expect that the JACK team wants to do such a
boring job - they're interested in ardour and so on - and
with reason.
> The main issue is that there is no cash incentive. Unless
Hehe. If I had money I'd immediately pay 20 people for writing
some improvements for free software. But I have none.
So, I'd really like to see JACK becoming an audio base for all
distributions. But unfortunately, I cannot code, otherwise
I'd try it.
Best regards
ce
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.