Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?
Date: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 9:03 pm

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht  wrote:

[SNIP]


I'll second specimen.  You could, for example, load a bunch of loops

into one "bank" and set each one to be triggered by a single

(different) note.  That would allow you to sequence them using a

keyboard, or better yet, a sequencer like seq24.


Route specimen's audio through jack-rack and the you can map your

controller knobs to (LADSPA) plug-in parameters, then do things like

filter sweeps, etc.  The only problem with that setup is that specimen

doesn't provide dedicated outputs for each sample.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 6:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, James Stone, (Thu May 15, 10:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 6:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Arnold Krille, (Fri May 16, 7:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Thu May 15, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Paul Coccoli, (Fri May 16, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 7:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 8:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Folderol, (Fri May 16, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Dave Phillips, (Fri May 16, 11:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Darren Landrum, (Fri May 16, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Phil Sexton, (Fri May 16, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Sat May 17, 12:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Sat May 17, 1:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Joakim Hernberg, (Fri May 16, 8:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 10:20 am)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Paul Davis, (Fri May 16, 12:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 12:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 10:51 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Ray Rashif, (Fri May 16, 9:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 9:45 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Fri May 16, 3:32 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Salvatore Di Pietro, (Fri May 16, 10:47 pm)