Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Cannam <cannam@...>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?
Date: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 9:51 pm

On 16/05/2008, Lee Revell  wrote:


9.0 r124 ("already the newest version" according to apt-get).


>  Do you use a custom .asoundrc?


Nope, I don't have an .asoundrc.


Chris

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 6:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, James Stone, (Thu May 15, 10:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 6:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Arnold Krille, (Fri May 16, 7:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Thu May 15, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Paul Coccoli, (Fri May 16, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 7:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 8:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Folderol, (Fri May 16, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Dave Phillips, (Fri May 16, 11:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Darren Landrum, (Fri May 16, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Phil Sexton, (Fri May 16, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Sat May 17, 12:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Sat May 17, 1:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Joakim Hernberg, (Fri May 16, 8:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 10:20 am)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Paul Davis, (Fri May 16, 12:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 12:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 10:51 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Ray Rashif, (Fri May 16, 9:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 9:45 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Fri May 16, 3:32 am)
Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Salvatore Di Pietro, (Fri May 16, 10:47 pm)