Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Svend-Erik <sv-e@...>

To: Cassiel <raffaele.morelli@...>

Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 2:48 pm

On tir, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 +0100, Cassiel wrote:

quoted text

> 5.3ms latencies: If you can't sense it... you don't need it
>
> r

Okay I allways learned that you should't be to proud to admit when your
wrong.

I just ran a few test with a keyboard playing both the keyboard's
soundmodule and through midi and Qsynth, and I must admit that latency
was down to 1.3 ms before the audible time differece disapeard.

I apologise for the rubbish.

/Sv-e

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:24 am)

[LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 R..., Peder Hedlund, (Tue Jan 27, 1:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Jan 29, 11:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] , nescivi, (Tue Mar 10, 12:57 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 1:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., alex stone, (Tue Mar 10, 1:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Mar 10, 2:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 1:45 pm)

Re: [LAU] , David Baron, (Tue Mar 10, 2:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 2:48 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Tue Mar 10, 2:32 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., alex stone, (Tue Mar 10, 1:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., nescivi, (Tue Mar 10, 1:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 2:25 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Jan 30, 4:53 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Robin Gareus, (Sun Feb 1, 3:43 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Jan 27, 5:38 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Jan 27, 1:46 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., James Stone, (Tue Jan 27, 2:29 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Folderol, (Tue Jan 27, 7:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Atte André Jensen, (Wed Jan 28, 7:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Folderol, (Wed Jan 28, 8:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 1:52 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Jan 27, 2:03 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 2:48 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Peder Hedlund, (Tue Jan 27, 5:17 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Ken Restivo, (Thu Jan 29, 9:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 2:06 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 7:49 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:05 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Lee Revell, (Sat Jan 31, 3:51 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sat Jan 31, 11:59 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 2:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Jan 27, 2:49 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:20 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., James Stone, (Tue Jan 27, 1:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., David Olofson, (Tue Jan 27, 1:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Jan 26, 8:40 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Hector Centeno, (Mon Jan 26, 9:39 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Cassiel, (Mon Jan 26, 9:51 am)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:57 am)