Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Svend-Erik <sv-e@...>

To: plutek-infinity <plutek@...>

Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 3:31 pm

On tir, 2009-01-27 at 10:20 -0500, plutek-infinity wrote:

quoted text

> >You don't have to, I own a RME Multiface wich I can squize down to 0.67
> >ms working in 96000Hz
>
> interesting -- i also work with a Multiface, and find that Jack will
> not start at anything less than 64 frames/period and 2 frames/buffer,
> which is 1.33ms latency at 96kHz. i didn't think 32 frames/period was
> possible with that hardware -- what's your jack command-line?
>
> thanks... cheers!
>
>

It's the soundcard that works in 96000Hz Jack is working with 192000Hz
and 64frames.

/Sv-e

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:24 am)

[LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 R..., Peder Hedlund, (Tue Jan 27, 1:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Jan 29, 11:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] , nescivi, (Tue Mar 10, 12:57 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 1:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., alex stone, (Tue Mar 10, 1:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Mar 10, 2:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 1:45 pm)

Re: [LAU] , David Baron, (Tue Mar 10, 2:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 2:48 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Tue Mar 10, 2:32 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., alex stone, (Tue Mar 10, 1:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., nescivi, (Tue Mar 10, 1:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 2:25 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Jan 30, 4:53 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Robin Gareus, (Sun Feb 1, 3:43 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Jan 27, 5:38 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Jan 27, 1:46 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., James Stone, (Tue Jan 27, 2:29 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Folderol, (Tue Jan 27, 7:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Atte André Jensen, (Wed Jan 28, 7:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Folderol, (Wed Jan 28, 8:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 1:52 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Jan 27, 2:03 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 2:48 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Peder Hedlund, (Tue Jan 27, 5:17 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Ken Restivo, (Thu Jan 29, 9:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 2:06 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., , (Fri Jan 30, 7:49 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:05 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Lee Revell, (Sat Jan 31, 3:51 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sat Jan 31, 11:59 am)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 2:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Jan 27, 2:49 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:21 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., plutek-infinity, (Tue Jan 27, 3:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Svend-Erik , (Tue Jan 27, 3:20 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., James Stone, (Tue Jan 27, 1:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., David Olofson, (Tue Jan 27, 1:41 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Jan 26, 8:40 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Hector Centeno, (Mon Jan 26, 9:39 pm)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Cassiel, (Mon Jan 26, 9:51 am)

Re: [LAU] >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:57 am)