linuxaudio.org

--001636e0a5abb080760479e35ade

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I guess my other option to keep the mATX and spend a little more to go with
- Intel i7 860 quad core 2.8ghz

- gigabyte P55M-UD2 micro ATX with decent firewire
any thoughts on the above welcome!
iain
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Danni Coy  wrote:
> Intel is generally considered faster for a single processor workstation

quoted text
> these days, but unless your planning to do a lot of very CPU intensive stuff

> (silly amounts of plugins or softsynths) It really shouldn't matter.

> In my opinion stability / quiteness (power consumption) is more important

> than CPU power. If you need 3d graphics then AMD do have some nice low power

> solutions, otherwise go with whatever is easiest for you.

>

> My list would be

> 1) A case with good sonic insulation. (the last one I bought for an audio

> workstation was an Antec something 180)

>

> 2) A high quality power supply with as large a fan as possible (larger fans

> make less noise).

>

> 3) Possibly a 3rd party CPU heat sink/fan combo design with quiteness in

> mind.

>

> 4) Look for a board with esata - It's very handy :)

>

> A lot of parts are rated for their noisyness at

> http://www.silentpcreview.com/  last time I built a workstation I cross

> referenced their reccomended parts with what my hardware people had until I

> found a match.

>

> Of course if you have your machine built into another room etc you won't

> need to worry so much about sound.

>

>

> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:

>

>> Thanks Daniel, that's good to know. Do you ( or anyone else ) have a

>> recommendation as to the ( holy war ) AMD Phenom vs Intel i5 or i7 question?

>> It's been years since I paid attention to hardware for linux audio and

>> suddenly I need to replace a machine quickly. I'm hoping to stay in midrange

>> for price. Too many options!

>>

>> Iain

>>

>>

>

--001636e0a5abb080760479e35ade

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I guess my other option to keep the mATX and spend a little more to go with=

 - Intel i7 860 quad core 2.8ghz- gigabyte P55M-UD2 micro ATX w=

ith decent firewireany thoughts on the above welcome!iain

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Danni Coy <=

span dir=3D"ltr"><danni.coy@gmail=

.com> wrote:

 Intel is generally considered faster for a single processor workstation th=

ese days, but unless your planning to do a lot of very CPU intensive stuff =

(silly amounts of plugins or softsynths) It really shouldn't matter. 
In my opinion stability / quiteness (power consumption) is more important t=

han CPU power. If you need 3d graphics then AMD do have some nice low power=

 solutions, otherwise go with whatever is easiest for you.My list w=

ould be 
1) A case with good sonic insulation. (the last one I bought for an audio w=

orkstation was an Antec something 180)2) A high quality power suppl=

y with as large a fan as possible (larger fans make less noise).
3) Possibly a 3rd party CPU heat sink/fan combo design with quiteness in mi=

nd.4) Look for a board with esata - It's very handy :)A=

 lot of parts are rated for their noisyness at http://www.silentpcreview.com/=A0 last=

 time I built a workstation I cross referenced their reccomended parts with=

 what my hardware people had until I found a match.
Of course if you have your machine built into another room etc you won&=

#39;t need to worry so much about sound.<=

br>On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Iain Dunc=

an <iainduncanlists@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Daniel, th=

at's good to know. Do you ( or anyone else ) have a recommendation as t=

o the ( holy war ) AMD Phenom vs Intel i5 or i7 question? It's been yea=

rs since I paid attention to hardware for linux audio and suddenly I need t=

o replace a machine quickly. I'm hoping to stay in midrange for price. =

Too many options!
Iain
--001636e0a5abb080760479e35ade--