linuxaudio.org

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:04:02 -0400, "Ivica Ico Bukvic"  wrote:

quoted text
>> Hey Ico,

>>

>> I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you mean. While I would

>> encourage the people from the Debian Multimedia Team to subscribe to a

>> list

>> like linux-audio-tuning to discuss tuning issues and grab ideas from

>> here,

>> I don't see how we could provide mirroring or any kind of services like

>> this (we have limited resources), and even if we could, I don't see why

>> *we* should do it.

>>

>> If I understood the original mail correctly, this initiative is meant to

>> be

>> integrated to *Debian*, and is meant to make the *Debian* distro better,

>> because it is *Debian* which has issues with linux-audio. Why should

>> linux-audio chime in ?

>

> Because this is an opportunity to extend distro transparency and

ultimately

quoted text
> allow developers to spend more time on developing rather than dealing

with

quoted text
> differences between distros.

hmm, ok. I'll give you this one.
> Besides, we already mirror UbuntuStudio, JACKlab, and 64Studio, so why

quoted text
> shouldn't we also encourage Debian Multimedia to join the consortium and

in

quoted text
> turn allow them to use whatever resources we may have.

I might have misunderstood something. Is Debian Multimedia a full featured

distro like 64studio or UbuntoStudio or an effort to make debian look

better regarding audio packages ?
My point was : if Debian Multimedia is just an effort to make things better

looking on the audio/multimedia side, then it has more to do with the

"Debian packages and process" group of people than with the linuxaudio

people.
Marc-Olivier Barre.

------

Participez au black-out anti-HADOPI :

http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/APPEL-HADOPI-blackout-du-net-francais

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user