Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010 - 8:05 pm

--0-21641064-1287086722=:14022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That's assuming that you begin using java with an IDE.=A0 I never started u=
sing eclipse until after like a couple years of programming.=A0 As long as =
you have the Java API on your system, doing it all on terminal is easy.

I see what you're saying though about "take this as given, ignore it for no=
w."=A0 What does public static void main( String[] args ) even mean anyway,=
right?=A0 Personally, I think the low-levelness of C might be a little int=
imidating.=A0 I've never used Python before, but it seems like it would be =
a better first language than Java.

-Kris

--- On Thu, 10/14/10, Philipp =DCberbacher wrote:

From: Philipp =DCberbacher
Subject: Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?
To: "linux-audio-user"
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 11:10 AM

Excerpts from Kris Calabio's message of 2010-10-14 19:22:32 +0200:

cience at my school, they were teaching Java.=A0 Personally, I thought it n=
ice to learn from.=A0 I then moved on to C and C++ pretty smoothly.=A0 (Tho=
ugh I still have alot to learn in C++).

I'm not experienced in any language but I've dabbled with a few, and
imho java and how it's taught here is far too complicated or rather
distracting.

The first thing newbies see, before hello world, is a beast like
eclipse, which alone causes a whole bunch of problems. Then they have
to mess with packages, and classes, and objects, although they teach it
here by saying "take this as given, ignore it for now". The next thing
they see are some funky classes that allow proper input/output because
java doesn't seem to have that. Only then they get to start programing
and can deal with javas built in funkyness.
What does the following example evaluate to?
=A0=A0=A01.2+3+"||"+3+2.1

I think there's far too much distracting mess to sort out before you
even get to programing, so I don't think it's a good teaching language
(for total beginners at least).

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
=0A=0A=0A
--0-21641064-1287086722=:14022
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That's assuming that you begin using java wit=
h an IDE.  I never started using eclipse until after like a couple yea=
rs of programming.  As long as you have the Java API on your system, d=
oing it all on terminal is easy.I see what you're saying though abo=
ut "take this as given, ignore it for now."  What does public static v=
oid main( String[] args ) even mean anyway, right?  Personally, I thin=
k the low-levelness of C might be a little intimidating.  I've never u=
sed Python before, but it seems like it would be a better first language th=
an Java.-Kris--- On Thu, 10/14/10, Philipp =DCberbacher =
<hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:From: Philipp =DCberbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com>Subject: R=
e:
[LAU] OT: C or C++?To: "linux-audio-user" <linux-audio-user@lists.l=
inuxaudio.org>Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 11:10 AMExcerpts from Kris Calabio's message of 2010-10-14 19:=
22:32 +0200:> What are everyone's honest thoughts on Java?  Whe=
n I started Computer Science at my school, they were teaching Java.  P=
ersonally, I thought it nice to learn from.  I then moved on to C and =
C++ pretty smoothly.  (Though I still have alot to learn in C++).&=
gt; > -KrisI'm not experienced in any language but I've dabb=
led with a few, andimho java and how it's taught here is far too compli=
cated or ratherdistracting.The first thing newbies see, before =
hello world, is a beast likeeclipse, which alone causes a whole bunch o=
f problems. Then they haveto mess with packages, and classes, and objec=
ts, although they teach ithere by saying "take this as given,
ignore it for now". The next thingthey see are some funky classes that=
allow proper input/output becausejava doesn't seem to have that. Only =
then they get to start programingand can deal with javas built in funky=
ness.What does the following example evaluate to?   =
1.2+3+"||"+3+2.1I think there's far too much distracting mess to so=
rt out before youeven get to programing, so I don't think it's a good t=
eaching language(for total beginners at least).________________=
_______________________________Linux-audio-user mailing listLinux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio=
.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user<=
/a>=0A=0A
--0-21641064-1287086722=:14022--


Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Wed Oct 13, 8:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Fri Oct 15, 12:26 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Oct 21, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Atte André Jensen, (Mon Oct 18, 10:25 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, James Morris, (Thu Oct 14, 1:30 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Oct 14, 3:06 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 4:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ng Oon-Ee, (Thu Oct 14, 5:49 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:40 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Tim Clewlow, (Thu Oct 14, 12:28 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:05 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Tim Clewlow, (Thu Oct 14, 1:37 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Thu Oct 14, 8:50 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Arnold Krille, (Wed Oct 13, 11:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Wed Oct 13, 10:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Folderol, (Wed Oct 13, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Wed Oct 13, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Robin Gareus, (Wed Oct 13, 10:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bjoern Lindig, (Thu Oct 14, 6:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Robin Gareus, (Thu Oct 14, 7:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Oct 14, 3:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Oct 13, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:11 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Joshua Boyd, (Thu Oct 14, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Erik de Castro Lopo, (Fri Oct 15, 10:51 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 6:30 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Harry Van Haaren, (Thu Oct 14, 9:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bernardo Barros, (Thu Oct 14, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Nick Dokos, (Thu Oct 14, 3:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 3:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 4:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 5:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Kris Calabio, (Thu Oct 14, 5:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Oct 14, 6:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 7:13 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Simon Wise, (Fri Oct 15, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Fri Oct 15, 9:31 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Dave Phillips, (Fri Oct 15, 10:23 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, James Morris, (Fri Oct 15, 7:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Fri Oct 15, 7:21 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 7:45 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Sun Oct 17, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Kris Calabio, (Thu Oct 14, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bernardo Barros, (Thu Oct 14, 8:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Oct 21, 12:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Folderol, (Thu Oct 14, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Veronica Merryfield, (Thu Oct 14, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 8:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 8:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 6:55 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Thu Oct 14, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Brett McCoy, (Thu Oct 14, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 9:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Chris Cannam, (Thu Oct 14, 9:23 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 2:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Charles , (Wed Oct 13, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Charles Henry, (Wed Oct 13, 10:07 pm)