Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robin Gareus <robin@...>
Cc: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...>, planetCCRMA <planetccrma@...>, linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010 - 1:13 am

On 12/09/2010 03:54 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

Ah Fernando, always jumping to conclusions before all the evidence is in :-)

A more thorough test (reproducing almost all the stuff I used last time
I performed live - the only thing missing are the usb controllers -
reveals that the problem is different (but strangely related to power
management).

Everything works fine in both cases - pci/pci express power management
On and Off, and using the "On Demand" governor - until I redo all Jack
connections using jmess. This is what triggers problems in jackd
(1.9.6). Tons of messages and xruns reported. Switching to the
"Performance" governor stops the error messages, but something is left
in a broken state inside jackd. For example, opening Firefox triggers
xruns (remember, I switched to "Performance" so now the cpu is running
at top speed). There were no xruns doing that before using jmess. Now to
the more confusing part. If I turn OFF the cpuspeed daemon
(/sbin/service cpuspeed stop) the xruns go away. What?? :-)

So now I stop everything (all jack clients, jack itself). I restart the
cpuspeed daemon. Then restart everything from scratch except for jmess
and I get no xruns.

Will keep investigating... it would seem that jmess is doing something
(or most probably not doing something) that is really upsetting jackd.

-- Fernando
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Sat Nov 27, 10:24 am)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Leigh Dyer, (Sat Nov 27, 12:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Thu Dec 9, 4:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Sat Nov 27, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Arnold Krille, (Sat Nov 27, 12:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Robin Gareus, (Thu Dec 9, 5:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Dec 9, 8:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Thu Dec 9, 5:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Thu Dec 9, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Robin Gareus, (Thu Dec 9, 8:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Sat Jan 29, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Tue Dec 28, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Robin Gareus, (Fri Jan 7, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Dec 9, 11:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Dec 10, 1:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Balance between performance and noise, rosea.grammostola, (Sat Nov 27, 10:11 pm)