Re: [LAU] memlock lack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 - 9:00 pm

--nextPart2216518.PEDojx6NKH
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday 27 May 2010 22:35:07 Hartmut Noack wrote:

The "special" reason is:

If several packages modify one file, its very hard to track the changes. Yo=
u=20
might want to purge packages with all their configuration later...
So its better if each package adds its own file to a directory and all thes=
e=20
files get parsed.

The same is done in /etc/apache2, in /etc/modprobe.d, in /etc/cron.[hourly|
daily|weekly|monthly] and many more. Its not a new and unknown method at al=
l.

Have fun,

Arnold

--nextPart2216518.PEDojx6NKH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkv+3UcACgkQuYLL1cDjHx1jBACfWiSok+31ZWvgRQwV+IOJL01M
5Z8Ani4hFsj9OQ3mAmIORT/1erQR96WN
=uQJ/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2216518.PEDojx6NKH--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] memlock lack, J., (Thu May 27, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Pablo Fernandez, (Thu May 27, 8:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Hartmut Noack, (Thu May 27, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Arnold Krille, (Thu May 27, 9:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Harry Van Haaren, (Thu May 27, 7:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, ailo, (Thu May 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] memlock lack, Harry Van Haaren, (Thu May 27, 8:02 pm)