Re: [LAU] ASCAP Assails Free-Culture, Digital-Rights Groups

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] ASCAP Assails Free-Culture, Digital-Rights Groups

Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 - 10:18 pm

On Wednesday 07 July 2010 14:05:55 you wrote:

quoted text

> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:40 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 July 2010 10:57:13 Hartmut Noack wrote:
> >> Am 07.07.2010 16:21, schrieb drew Roberts:
> >> > On Wednesday 07 July 2010 09:09:51 Hartmut Noack wrote:
> >> >> So there should be a better system to make sure the work of artists
> >> >> will be compensated if you want fulltime artists.
> >> >>
> >> >> And such work is scarce, because you need to have people working for
> >> >> months to get an album filled with ideas manifested in actual
> >> >> recordings.
> >
> > I am pretty sure Sean T Wright: http://www.seantwright.com has put out an
> > album a month for an astounding number of months now. (I think that is
> > the deal.)
>
> So my question to the community goes something like this:
>
> (Assume everything is digital for now and there's no DRM so as to make
> this easier...)
>
> 1) One person makes music and gives it away for free. That's his
> business. I can get her music for free and he's happy.
>
> 2) Another person makes music and attempts to sell it. That's his
> business. I can buy his music and he's happy. If I get his music some
> other way he's presumably not happy, if he knows.
>
> 3) Another person makes music and isn't confident he can sell it so he
> works with a company. The company and he have an agreement and they
> are either happy or not happy with each other. It's immaterial to me.
> Let's call it 'their' music since they are in business together. I can
> buy their music and they are happy. If I get it some other way then
> presumably they are not happy, if they know.
>
> The question about #2 & #3 is whether it's _ever_ OK to get the music
> if I didn't pay. I contend it isn't. I don't _need_ the music. I
> _want_ the music, or think I do.

Seriously, other people don't have any natural right to control others at this
level.

I always go back to jokes. Do you or anyone you know ever tell jokes that they
did not come up with themselves? If so, is any effort made to determine who
came up with the joke? To determine if the person want's to be paid every
time the joke is told? How often do you hear a joke's originator credited
when a joke is told?

quoted text

>
> Why is this any different than taking two trips to the salad bar when
> the menu said only one was OK with the restaurant?

Because this is an artificial limitation put on society by the government.
That is how it is different. So if the government did not put on this
limitation, it would be ok no matter what 2 or 3 wants. Their options would
be to not give it out at all or try and protect it technically but without
force of law behind the technological restrictions.

You are still equating selling *copies* of music with selling music.

Nothing stops 2 from gaining some popularity and then announcing that he has a
hot new single in the can and that he will release it if he gets X dollars in
binding commitments from wherever. This could be 1 dollar from X people or X
dollars from 1 person or any combo. When he gets X dollars in commitments, he
releases the tune. He has just sold his music. He hasn't necessarily sold any
particular number of copies.

quoted text

>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> P.S. - I love what Sean Wright is doing here - both for himself and
> for us. Very cool. Thanks for the link.

linuxaudio.org

Re: [LAU] ASCAP Assails Free-Culture, Digital-Rights Groups