linuxaudio.org

--0016e64c1ef6bcff3b04afa6346b

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Arnold Krille  wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 October 2011 11:23:09 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:

quoted text
> > On 10/19/2011 10:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> > > +1, regarding to Jamin is good and it does work without pumping.

> >

> > I'm not so fond of JAMin. It has flaws and consumes way too much CPU.

> > About a year ago Patrick Shirkey mentioned that there was no other JACK

> > application that attempts to provide a complete mastering chain. But

> > that was about a year ago, at the moment it is perfectly possible to

> > create a similar tool chain with the help of plug-ins. I prefer plug-ins

> > then, more flexible.

>

> Completely rebuilding Jamin with single plugins will consume even more cpu

> than jamin itself. The reason is that jamin is actually built from plugins

> (the look-ahead and the compressors are plugins) but also merges plugins

> internally to optimize for speed...

>

I haven't had issues per se with CPU resources (whern I am using Jamin, I am

not doing anything else except recording the output), but what are the

alleged flaws in Jamin?
--

Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it

would overturn the world."

    -- Jelaleddin Rumi
--0016e64c1ef6bcff3b04afa6346b

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Arnold Krille <=

span dir=3D"ltr"><arnold@arnolda=

rts.de> wrote:
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 11:23:09 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:

quoted text
> On 10/19/2011 10:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> > +1, regarding to Jamin is good and it does work without pumping.<=

br>

quoted text
>

> I'm not so fond of JAMin. It has flaws and consumes way too much C=

PU.

quoted text
> About a year ago Patrick Shirkey mentioned that there was no other JAC=

K

quoted text
> application that attempts to provide a complete mastering chain. But

> that was about a year ago, at the moment it is perfectly possible to

> create a similar tool chain with the help of plug-ins. I prefer plug-i=

ns

quoted text
> then, more flexible.

Completely rebuilding Jamin with single plugins will consume even more cpu<=

br>

than jamin itself. The reason is that jamin is actually built from plugins<=

br>

(the look-ahead and the compressors are plugins) but also merges plugins

internally to optimize for speed...I h=

aven't had issues per se with CPU resources (whern I am using Jamin, I =

am not doing anything else except recording the output), but what are the a=

lleged flaws in Jamin?
-- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com---=

---------------------------------------------------------------------&q=

uot;In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it =

would overturn the world."
=A0 =A0 -- Jelaleddin Rumi
--0016e64c1ef6bcff3b04afa6346b--