Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze..

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, October 20, 2011 - 11:02 pm

On 21/10/11 05:55, James Stone wrote:

Nice work -- I'm certainly no expert on shoegaze, but it definitely
seems like it's in keeping with the genre to me. The structure actually
reminded me more of electronic music than traditional writing, with the
way it builds up from elements introduced at fairly regular intervals
rather than having a strong verse/chorus/verse/chorus structure. That
might make sense given how you put the track together, though :)

I know it's the kind of genre that tends toward a slow burn, so I could
be right off the mark here, but it felt like it could have done with
some more textural variety by the end of it. I love the spacey,
washed-out feel of the guitars, but I wonder if there's some other way
you could mix up that texture in the second half of the track, rather
than just building up the same guitar parts again. I'm afraid I can't
offer any ideas, though!

Thanks
Leigh

>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] More Shoegaze.., James Stone, (Thu Oct 20, 6:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Oct 21, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., Leigh Dyer, (Thu Oct 20, 11:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., S. Massy, (Thu Oct 20, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., Leigh Dyer, (Thu Oct 20, 10:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., S. Massy, (Thu Oct 20, 11:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Oct 20, 9:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., James Stone, (Thu Oct 20, 9:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] More Shoegaze.., S. Massy, (Thu Oct 20, 10:50 pm)