linuxaudio.org

Am 12.02.2011 11:07, schrieb Robert Jonsson:

quoted text
> 2011/2/12 Hartmut Noack:

>> Am 12.02.2011 00:12, schrieb Ken Restivo:

> <...>

>>>> Seq24 fits your description 1:1.

>>>

>>> Thanks. I used it successfully for years on a 64-bit 2.33Ghz Intel PC with

>>> 2GB RAM, but it is unusably slow on a 1.6Ghz 32-bit Intel PC with 1GB RAM.

>>

>> No offence ment but what 1.6 GHz/1GB RAM machine is that?

>>

>> I had Seq24 running on a Toshiba Laptop with 1GHz PIII and 256RAM and it was

>> running perfectly OK. A collegue used it professionally on a 800 MHz Celeron

>> with 256 RAM.

>

> I'd have to agree with that, most old sk00l linux sequencers should

> really have no problem on an 1.6Ghz machine.

Now I remember: I had it even running in a usable manner on my archaic

Dell Latitude with 500MHz PII/128 RAM.

Gave my very first public talk on Jack with introducing Rezound and Muse

with that Laptop ;-)
> This thread woke old memories of trying to create music in a linux

quoted text
> environment ten years ago and the trials and tribulations you had to

> go through.

I also check the Jazz++ Site from time to time to see if there is

something new.

Anybody out there remembering Slab?
http://www.llornkcor.com/SLab/SLab.html
> We've definitely come long way, though there is always ways to go.

quoted text
> I recall having a Pentium II Celeron 300A (likely overclocked) at that

> time which I was running MusE under, midi was never a problem, could

> only run a few audio tracks though.

>

> Regards,

> Robert

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-user mailing list

> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

>

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user