Re: [LAU] codecs vs patents

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, February 13, 2011 - 9:09 pm

On 13/02/11 22:50, Patrick Shirkey wrote:

I've only skimmed the document you linked, but I'm not sure what your
implications are around HTML5 video and the Microsoft/Nokia deal. I
can't see Microsoft doing anything to kill HTML5 in general -- they have
just as much to gain from it in the mobile space as anyone else.

Microsoft will certainly push H.264 and AAC, but so did Nokia. In fact,
despite their generally excellent service to open-source in general,
Nokia was one of the most vocal opponents to the inclusion of mandatory
Vorbis and Theora support in the HTML5 draft specifications.

Thanks
Leigh
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] codecs vs patents, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Feb 13, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAU] codecs vs patents, Leigh Dyer, (Sun Feb 13, 9:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] codecs vs patents, Daniel Roviriego, (Sun Feb 13, 4:09 pm)