Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <markknecht@...>, <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, February 28, 2011 - 7:54 pm

--_0edb2988-64f7-43b9-8449-78cd8d7bedea_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I wonder how we could evangelize Linux Audio more effectively to the

Linux audio needs marketing=2C it needs to get some editorial space (which =
is
basically free advertising) that says the platform and tools are where peop=
le
should maybe consider being.

Now the Harrison boys might have some reason to do that but I doubt it=2C i=
e=2C=20
they have a marketing budget but I don't think that will be for promoting t=
he
Linux product line.

It might be possible to poll/harass/promote linux audio with some of the au=
dio
magazines and see if anybody wants to pick up the story and run with it. I =
only
rarely read these and their current focus may be away from free platforms a=
nd
into apps at the moment.

After that=2C if their attention can be grabbed=2C somebody has to decide w=
hat to
present. That will be difficult. Corporate marketing messages are all about
focusing on the current developments=2C the differentiators and the message
that the company wants to take to the market. The rather anarchic Linux
Audio community might not have a single coherent message that they want
to be brought across: what does Linux Audio have to offer? Read that=20
statement carefully=2C it is not intended as a challenge as I think linux a=
udio
has a lot to offer however that has to be packaged into a 'nugget'=2C a sin=
gle
message that goes out to the market.

Regards=2C nick.
=

--_0edb2988-64f7-43b9-8449-78cd8d7bedea_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

&gt=3B I wonder how we could evangelize Linux Audio more effectively to th=
e&gt=3B outside world?Linux audio needs marketing=2C it needs t=
o get some editorial space (which isbasically free advertising) that sa=
ys the platform and tools are where peopleshould maybe consider being.<=
br>Now the Harrison boys might have some reason to do that but I doubt =
it=2C ie=2C they have a marketing budget but I don't think that will be=
for promoting theLinux product line.It might be possible to po=
ll/harass/promote linux audio with some of the audiomagazines and see i=
f anybody wants to pick up the story and run with it. I onlyrarely read=
these and their current focus may be away from free platforms andinto =
apps at the moment.After that=2C if their attention can be grabbed=
=2C somebody has to decide what topresent. That will be difficult. Corp=
orate marketing messages are all aboutfocusing on the current developme=
nts=2C the differentiators and the messagethat the company wants to tak=
e to the market. The rather anarchic LinuxAudio community might not hav=
e a single coherent message that they wantto be brought across: what do=
es Linux Audio have to offer? Read that statement carefully=2C it is no=
t intended as a challenge as I think linux audiohas a lot to offer howe=
ver that has to be packaged into a 'nugget'=2C a singlemessage that goe=
s out to the market.Regards=2C nick.
=

--_0edb2988-64f7-43b9-8449-78cd8d7bedea_--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Mon Feb 28, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Wed Mar 2, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Mar 2, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ray Rashif, (Wed Mar 2, 3:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Burkhard Wölfel, (Tue Mar 1, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Mar 1, 9:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., S C Rigler, (Tue Mar 1, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Folderol, (Tue Mar 1, 11:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Mar 1, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 11:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Tue Mar 1, 11:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Mar 1, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Bearcat M. , (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Wed Mar 2, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Wed Mar 2, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Mar 3, 12:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Mark Knecht, (Thu Mar 3, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Mar 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Renato, (Thu Mar 3, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Tue Mar 1, 9:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Luke Peterson, (Tue Mar 1, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 7:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Mar 12, 7:38 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Mar 9, 7:08 am)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., David Baron, (Mon Feb 28, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 28, 8:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ronald Stewart, (Mon Feb 28, 8:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Nick Copeland, (Mon Feb 28, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 6:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Joe Hartley, (Mon Feb 28, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., Ricardus Vincente, (Mon Feb 28, 7:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] "Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"..., James Stone, (Mon Feb 28, 7:35 pm)