Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd

Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 - 4:17 pm

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:40:39PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:

quoted text

> On 05/24/2011 01:12 AM, Eric Steinberg wrote:
> >Thanks, Paul. If jack had not crashed, shouldn't rotter have continued
> >to record? Is there any way to establish why recording was interrupted?
> > This happened about a week after I had started recording on this system.
>
> interesting usecase. i never run jack for that long... but i guess
> some people who are using it for museum exhibits do.

It could be anything actually, but the first thing that went to my mind
was a 32bit integer overflow (sample count maybe) somewhere in the audio
software chain...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Mon May 23, 10:56 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Paul Davis, (Mon May 23, 11:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Wed Jul 13, 7:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Eric Steinberg, (Mon May 23, 11:12 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue May 24, 2:40 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Roberto, (Tue May 24, 4:17 pm)

Re: [LAU] qjackctl does not reflect state of jackd, Lieven Moors, (Wed May 25, 8:29 pm)