Re: [LAU] Until now Debian seems to be the right decision :), better performance than Ubuntu

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robin Gareus <robin@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 - 1:04 pm

> Not if you apt-pin them and only take what you need. I never had a

certainly if you are careful and only take what you want from, and keep track of what is breaking things, then you can
make it work.

I personally prefer to have a separate system for those codecs and such, and use
them as little as possible.

There is another reason to use two boots - Ralf mentioned using wine, and having
a 64bit system. Wine is much easier on 32bit systems, and it would be a good
idea to have a 32bit system (set up to be used via chroot perhaps) for wine
so it may as well be something like Mint which includes the stuff that debian
won't include.

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Until now Debian seems to be the right decision :)..., Simon Wise, (Tue May 31, 1:04 pm)
[LAU] KORG NANOKONTROL, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue May 31, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] KORG NANOKONTROL, Simon Wise, (Tue May 31, 1:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] KORG NANOKONTROL, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue May 31, 1:51 pm)