linuxaudio.org

> Touch interface is good for some things. Not useful for all things (for example,

quoted text
> there is no way to "hover" over anything using a touch interface). I don't think

> that an interface that's good for one will be good of the other.

>

> Personally, I think that the desktop Linux GUIs are way too late to the mobile

> game. Android is the *Nix standard bearer in that field.

It may well be a fools chase and bound to fail, or they may make something good,

in any case it seems that it is the touch interface that is the target for

gnome, though I guess that may change.
And to quibble, iOS is a darwin GUI, so is certainly also *nix, though just as

certainly mach rather than linux, while android is a linux GUI, though I

understand that google and the rest of the kernel developers have parted company

and the maintenance of the google code was taken out of the main linux kernel,

then the code was too ... it is still at least a fork of linux, and not far from

it yet.
At least in its OSX version darwin is actually certified unix I believe, so no *

needed there.
How open/free/locked etc those systems may or may not be is another question

altogether, which may have more than a little bit to do with why they are the

ones preferred by companies selling phones, and is certainly the reason I'd like

to see other options around.
Simon.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user