Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, August 5, 2011 - 11:19 am

--90e6ba61385472d27d04a9c043ac
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, rosea grammostola <
rosea.grammostola@gmail.com> wrote:

> To become a veteran you have to become a newbie first. When we put

True, and I'm all in for making the learning curve less steep, but
rebranding things with names that are unassociated with them is IMO totally
the wrong way to go.

Don't hit people getting intrested with all the terminology, only use words
that they will probably understand, I get it. But calling it something that
its not *just so people will like it* is plain silly IMO.

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Dale Powell wrote:

> As the OS in FLOSS stands for Open Source it's hardly a rebranding though

In that instance I'd have no problem, as you pointed out its not
*rebranding*, its making it easier to access for beginners and I'm all up
for that.

--90e6ba61385472d27d04a9c043ac
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, rosea grammosto=
la <ros=
ea.grammostola@gmail.com
> wrote:

=20
=20
=20

To become a veteran you have to become a newbie first. When we put
LinuxMusicians.com on air, we got the same replies. But I think
LinuxMusicians.com has proven to be a nice starting platform for
newbies who explore the possibilities of Linuxaudio. For some it's =
a
nice pre-step for the LAU mailinglist.

I think we could do both. Helping newbies and turning people into
veteran linuxaudio guys. But both aims needs a different approach.<=
/div>=A0True, and I'm all in for making the learn=
ing curve less steep, but rebranding things with names that are unassociate=
d with them is IMO totally the wrong way to go.
Don't hit people getting intrested with all the terminology, only u=
se words that they will probably understand, I get it. But calling it somet=
hing that its not *just so people will like it* is plain silly IMO.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Dale Po=
well <dj_kaza@h=
otmail.com
> wrote:

As the OS in FLOSS=20
stands for Open Source it's hardly a rebranding though is it? Why force=
=20
people who may have never heard of it to search the internet to find out
what an acronym stands for when there is a nicer on the eyes, ears and=20
minds term that sums it up pretty much as well?=
In that instance I'd have no problem, as yo=
u pointed out its not *rebranding*, its making it easier to access for begi=
nners and I'm all up for that.

--90e6ba61385472d27d04a9c043ac--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Aurélien Leblond, (Fri Aug 5, 8:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, fred, (Fri Aug 5, 5:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Aug 5, 12:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Renato, (Fri Aug 5, 3:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 12:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Aug 5, 12:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 10:43 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, , (Fri Aug 5, 11:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 11:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, , (Fri Aug 5, 11:35 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 12:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 1:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, olivier, (Fri Aug 5, 7:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, olivier, (Sat Aug 6, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Tue Aug 9, 2:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, guerrier, (Sat Aug 6, 3:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Jeremy Jongepier, (Fri Aug 5, 7:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 7:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, olivier, (Fri Aug 5, 7:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 7:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 2:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Harry van Haaren, (Fri Aug 5, 10:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Aug 6, 11:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, fred, (Sun Aug 7, 5:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Dale Powell, (Fri Aug 5, 11:11 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 11:11 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Harry van Haaren, (Fri Aug 5, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, rosea grammostola, (Fri Aug 5, 11:32 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, , (Fri Aug 5, 11:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Sebastian Moors, (Fri Aug 5, 9:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Emanuel Rumpf, (Sun Aug 7, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Hartmut Noack, (Mon Aug 8, 4:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, hermann, (Fri Aug 5, 9:40 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Aug 5, 9:07 am)
Re: [LAU] Subject=Re: community pages, fred, (Fri Aug 5, 5:54 pm)