Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Joe Hartley <jh@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, January 9, 2012 - 4:24 pm

--20cf307d048e0db8ae04b61ad444
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi and thanks for the replies!
Actually, regarding latency, I'm running with 2.9ms right now (64 buffers 2
periods), and it's rock solid.
The problem is that soon there will be no more support for my rt kernel.
20ms. would be a huge downgrade for me, as tracking becomes a bit
problematic with such figures.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Joe Hartley wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:23:20 +0200

--20cf307d048e0db8ae04b61ad444
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi and thanks for the replies!Actually, regarding late=
ncy, I'm running with 2.9ms right now (64 buffers 2 periods), and it&#3=
9;s rock solid. The problem is that soon there will be no more support =
for my rt kernel.
20ms. would be a huge downgrade for me, as tracking becomes a bit problemat=
ic with such figures.On Mon, Jan=
9, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Joe Hartley <jh@brainiac.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:23:2=
0 +0200
Moshe Werner <moshwe@gmail.com&g=
t; wrote:

> Heard good things about Arch in audio use too. Anyone got experience w=
ith

I've been using Arch for a couple of months now. =A0I really like=
the fact
that it's very streamlined. =A0I'm not running anything in the back=
ground
that isn't necessary and my performance on my old P4 with 2GB RAM is
better than I have any right to expect. =A0I recently recorded and mixed an=

album that had 40-50 tracks when we were done, and it was only when I
started overloading the fx that I ran into trouble, and then it was just
a matter of being smarter about submix busses and putting the fx on the
submixes to get me out of trouble. =A0I still had lots going on with it.

Unfortunately, the degree of difficulty is quite high. =A0Fortunately I&#39=
;ve
been a UNIX professional for 25 years, and have been working with Linux
since the Yggdrasil days, but it still threw me a few curves before I
got the system to a workable point.

I had been a Fedora/CCRMA fan for years, but I think the last release
I had good performace on was F12. =A0With any luck I'll be able to upgr=
ade
the hardware soon and will get to go through this all over again! =A0My
problem there is that I have 2 Delta 1010s so I need 2 PCI slots, and
they're getting harder to find these days.

Good luck!

- Joe
__________________________________=
_____________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@l=
ists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

--20cf307d048e0db8ae04b61ad444--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 2:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Jan 11, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Jan 12, 8:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Fri Jan 13, 12:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Wed Jan 11, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Dave Phillips, (Wed Jan 11, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Jan 12, 8:11 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Thu Jan 12, 8:25 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Jan 12, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Thu Jan 12, 6:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, michael noble, (Tue Jan 10, 12:47 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Ronald Stewart, (Tue Jan 10, 1:05 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Jan 9, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 9:02 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Paul Davis, (Tue Jan 10, 12:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, tee, (Thu Jan 12, 4:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Fri Jan 13, 4:59 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Fri Jan 13, 7:45 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Nicola Pandini, (Sat Jan 14, 10:38 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Feb 20, 7:38 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Fri Jan 13, 8:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, fred, (Tue Jan 10, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Wed Jan 11, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jan 11, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Brett McCoy, (Wed Jan 11, 1:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Diego Simak, (Tue Jan 10, 12:07 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 8:15 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, gene heskett, (Tue Jan 10, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 3:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Hartmut Noack, (Mon Jan 9, 5:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 5:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Hartmut Noack, (Mon Jan 9, 9:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Mon Jan 9, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Jan 10, 7:02 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jan 9, 4:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Joe Hartley, (Mon Jan 9, 3:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 4:24 pm)