Re: [LAU] Fairlight

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, October 25, 2012 - 1:44 am

On Thu, October 25, 2012 12:29 pm, michael noble wrote:

The LAU list is a general topic mailing list which has a proven history of
being a brutal debate environment. It is what it is. Maybe it's because
musos and artistic types tend to be more passionate than most other
personality types. Maybe it's because people on this list tend to say
what's on their minds more than other lists. Maybe it's because Linux
Audio peeps are really just a bunch of a-holes that can't work with normal
non aggressive people ;-)

Maybe that's why Linux Audio Devs and Users are attracted to Linux Audio
in the first place?

> Back to the topic at hand, the fairlight website doesn't give any

IIUC the Linux part of the system is more like a communication protocol
for the physical controls to communicate with the FPGA. It's unlikely that
they have developed closed source Linux drivers for their audio cards yet
or that they ever will.

--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Wed Oct 24, 3:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 3:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Kaza Kore, (Wed Oct 24, 6:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 11:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Thu Oct 25, 12:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Brett McCoy, (Thu Oct 25, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 9:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 8:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 9:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 10:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:03 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Thu Oct 25, 1:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Simon Wise, (Thu Oct 25, 2:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Robin Gareus, (Thu Oct 25, 2:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Thu Oct 25, 3:38 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 1:44 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, david, (Wed Oct 24, 7:09 pm)