Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering software

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012 - 8:05 pm

--bcaec5015ddf82842404cf5757bf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Grekim wrote:

[snip]

It's too bad the closed source issue has rubbed you guys the wrong way.

You're not likely to get any respect from this community unless/until you
release your source code under a free/libre license. Who have spent decades
and 10's of thousands of hours working on projects that we give away freely
and openly, your software is irrelevant and your request for respect is
borderline insulting. If you're truly proud of what you've created, then
show it to the world. You're not getting the feedback you want because no
one wants to run your mysterious binary blob, and I don't blame them.
You're never going to strike it rich with this software, so the only
legitimate reason you could possibly have for not sharing the source code
is that you're ashamed of what a mess it is.

--bcaec5015ddf82842404cf5757bf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Grekim <grekimj@acousticrefuge.com> wrote:[snip]

It's too bad the closed source issue has rubbed you
guys the wrong way.=C2=A0 The way I see it, I've invested well over 100=
0
hours and a year of work on something which I ask nothing for in return
except maybe a little respect now and then :)=C2=A0 You're not likely to get any respect from this communit=
y unless/until you release your source code under a free/libre license. Who=
have spent decades and 10's of thousands of hours working on projects =
that we give away freely and openly, your software is irrelevant and your r=
equest for respect is borderline insulting. If you're truly proud of wh=
at you've created, then show it to the world. You're not getting th=
e feedback you want because no one wants to run your mysterious binary blob=
, and I don't blame them. You're never going to strike it rich with=
this software, so the only legitimate reason you could possibly have for n=
ot sharing the source code is that you're ashamed of what a mess it is.=

=C2=A0

--bcaec5015ddf82842404cf5757bf--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering soft..., J. Liles, (Sun Nov 25, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering soft..., Bob van der Poel, (Mon Nov 26, 12:49 am)