Re: [LAU] recording IR's ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012 - 8:01 pm

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:53:36 alexander wrote:

Use as is. It is already the response to an almost perfect delta-peak.

If you really know the popping sound of your ballon, you could deconvolve that
to get the response to a real delta-peak.
But when you record two signals, one far away and one near the
ballon/gun/wood-blocks and then use the nearer signal for deconvolution, you
will probably also eliminate the early-reflections. Of course if its only the
long tail you are after...

Another note: When you do not cut the inital peak, you won't have to decide on
the level of the IR compared to the dry signal. Because then your IR'ed signal
is original (as it sounds through a popping balloon) and reflections.

Have fun,

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)



Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] recording IR's ?, alexander, (Thu Mar 22, 12:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] recording IR's ?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Mar 22, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] recording IR's ?, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Mar 22, 9:36 pm)