linuxaudio.org

--90e6ba308ef27f9ede04c08f1333

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <

alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com> wrote:
>

quoted text
> http://wiki.audacityteam.org/index.php?title=Noise_Removal

>

>

Please no.  Unless they have had a giant jump up in quality in recent

months, this just doesn't cut it.

Tools on linux are audacity or gnome wave cleaner (

quoted text
> http://gwc.sourceforge.net/) - or you can also try our new noise

> reduction algorithms with auphonic:

>

> http://auphonic.com/blog/2012/05/11/experimental-noise-reduction-and-alg...

>

GWC last I checked hadn't been developed in some time.  Hadn't heard of

auphonic, will have to take a look right now.
Others have given good comments as chances are for traffic noise which can

be variable can be difficult to filter out of a recording.  Note that I

didn't say remove, or even denoise, as neither of those are accurate and

you will never end up with an identical quality recording as if it wasn't

there, or really even close in many cases.
Personally at the moment I am using Festige combined with WaveARTs MR Noise

for realtime noise reduction on Linux.  This was extensively used on the

recent video that was part of the Tube Kickstarter campaign (ABout 16

instances of thise IIRC combined with other tools that were suggested

elsewhere in this thread).  But Ricardus is completely correct, I have yet

to find quality noise reduction tools on Linux.  I do need to check out the

aforementioned auphonic however, hadn't heard that.
            Seablade
--90e6ba308ef27f9ede04c08f1333

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Alexand=

re Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@gmail.com> =

wrote:
http://wiki.audacityteam.org/index.php?title=3DNoise_=

Removal

Please no.=A0 Unless they have had a giant jump up in quality i=

n recent months, this just doesn't cut it.
Tools on linux are audacity or gnome wave cleaner (http://gwc.sourceforge.net/) - or you=

 can also try our new noise reduction algorithms with auphonic:http://auphonic.com/blog/2012/05/11/exp=

erimental-noise-reduction-and-algorithm-chooser/

GWC last I checked hadn't been developed in some =

time.=A0 Hadn't heard of auphonic, will have to take a look right now.<=

br>Others have given good comments as chances are for traffic noise whi=

ch can be variable can be difficult to filter out of a recording.=A0 Note t=

hat I didn't say remove, or even denoise, as neither of those are accur=

ate and you will never end up with an identical quality recording as if it =

wasn't there, or really even close in many cases.

Personally at the moment I am using Festige combined with WaveARTs MR N=

oise for realtime noise reduction on Linux.=A0 This was extensively used on=

 the recent video that was part of the Tube Kickstarter campaign (ABout 16 =

instances of thise IIRC combined with other tools that were suggested elsew=

here in this thread).=A0 But Ricardus is completely correct, I have yet to =

find quality noise reduction tools on Linux.=A0 I do need to check out the =

aforementioned auphonic however, hadn't heard that.

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade
--90e6ba308ef27f9ede04c08f1333--