Re: [LAU]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robin Gareus <robin@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Subject: Re: [LAU]
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - 4:21 pm

On 30 May 2012, at 16:58, Robin Gareus wrote:

> On 05/30/2012 03:09 PM, Sciss wrote:

thanks for the link and the info. so you think atom processors are fine enough? the latency actually doesn't matter in my case. i'm more worried that i'm going to through a lot of CPU heavy stuff on it, as this will run experimental software I wrote myself (and I won't have any time for performance tuning of the software itself).

>

Yes I know about MOTU. But that's the asset I have, so it would save me money getting an additional interface. If the onboard sound can go to 8x analog that would be perfect, otherwise I will need to add a cheap multichannel sound interface. 8 chans would be minimum. your presonus is definitely out of the current budget.

best, .h.h.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] , Sciss, (Wed May 30, 1:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Robin Gareus, (Wed May 30, 3:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Sciss, (Wed May 30, 4:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu May 31, 5:17 am)
Re: [LAU] , Joshua D. Boyd, (Fri Jun 1, 5:39 am)
Re: [LAU] , Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Fri Jun 1, 3:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Robin Gareus, (Thu May 31, 11:14 am)
Re: [LAU] , S. Massy, (Thu May 31, 3:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Robin Gareus, (Wed May 30, 4:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Leigh Dyer, (Wed May 30, 11:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Egor Sanin, (Wed May 30, 6:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Kelly Hirai, (Wed May 30, 5:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Egor Sanin, (Wed May 30, 3:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] , Sciss, (Wed May 30, 4:08 pm)