--f46d04088c7faceba004c3da366a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
they don't even need to be equal. anything that can share a sample clock
can be made to run in perfect sync. ADAT clock has some issues, in my
experience. S/PDIF clock is better. Word clock is best.
--f46d04088c7faceba004c3da366a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Ralf Ma=
rdorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at
Apologize to the OP. So using ADAT + a wc sync, as the OP does, is a<=
br>
benefit?!
If so, I should get a RME Word Clock Module (WCM). That won't make the<=
br>
ADA 8000 a better device, but at least phases between the RME and the
Behringer (or some better ADAT devices) would be clean.
Just for the record. SPDIF and ADAT can sync two or more =A0e q u a l
sound devices?they don't even need to be equa=
l. anything that can share a sample clock can be made to run in perfect syn=
c. ADAT clock has some issues, in my experience. S/PDIF clock is better. Wo=
rd clock is best.
--f46d04088c7faceba004c3da366a--
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.